paper · PAPER-INT-HIGHER-GAUGE

Admissible Witness Descent for Higher Gauge Fields

Independent research article — not peer reviewed interface-theory higher-gauge-theory descent witness-reconstruction cech-descent

Read PDF →

Paper at a glance

What this paper is doing

A relative reconstruction theory for declared subdiagrams of higher-gauge descent, with computable homotopy fibers, abelian defect complexes, nonabelian filler towers, and four finite reconstruction certificates.

Read the paper →

Established here

What it actually establishes

No source-verified relation recorded yet.

Program position

What it uses or packages

No source-verified relation recorded yet.

Open exits

What remains conjectural or open

No source-verified relation recorded yet.

Claim discipline

Nearest claim boundaries

No source-verified relation recorded yet.

On this page

J. Scott Little
Independent Researcher, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Website Edition v1.0 — September 8, 2026
Independent research article · Not peer reviewed

Abstract

Higher gauge fields are normally reconstructed from a complete local descent diagram. This paper asks a narrower and more operational question: when only a declared subdiagram of local fields, overlaps, and coherences is retained, what does that selected information actually determine?

The paper defines the admitted witness reconstruction and its homotopy fiber. That fiber distinguishes three different failures: no globalization, more than one globalization, and gauge symmetry invisible to the retained witnesses. For abelian gerbes, a shifted mapping cone computes the relative defect. For nonabelian crossed modules, a filtered tower of coherent fillers replaces the unavailable additive cone. Four finite calculations show that a single missing higher coherence can obstruct globalization, a sparse dominated star can still reconstruct, transported coefficient action can obstruct even when the Postnikov class vanishes, and barycentric subdivision redistributes rather than removes a defect.

Conditional BRST/BV and Lorentzian Yang–Mills sections specify the additional differential, multiplicative, equation-bundle, and coherent-arrow data required for those interfaces. They do not construct a quantization or prove anomaly cancellation, a Yang–Mills mass gap, or confinement.

Main contribution

The standard machinery is higher-stack descent, homotopy limits, truncated cofinality, differential cocycles, crossed modules, local coefficients, and BV/BRST complexes. The paper's contribution is the relative reconstruction architecture for a declared witness subdiagram, together with explicit finite certificates that compute or falsify reconstruction.

The central object is

Its interpretation is direct:

  • an empty fiber means the admitted local data do not globalize;
  • multiple connected components mean globalization is ambiguous;
  • higher homotopy groups record automorphisms invisible to the witnesses;
  • a contractible fiber means the selected data reconstruct that global field uniquely up to coherent equivalence.

Four finite certificates

  1. Missing tetrahedron. Boundary data can satisfy every retained face condition yet fail the omitted tetrahedral coherence, producing a sharp obstruction.
  2. Dominated star. A sparse witness system obtained by deleting a dominated patch star can still reconstruct because an explicit chain contraction kills the relative defect.
  3. Transported action. For the split crossed module , the Postnikov class vanishes while inversion transport yields the condition . The obstruction is transported action, not an associator.
  4. Subdivision. Barycentric subdivision spreads the original defect over 24 refined tetrahedra, but their alternating product remains the single invariant obstruction.

Scope

This article does not claim invention of descent, homotopy fibers, mapping cones, standard obstruction theory, higher bundles, or BV/BRST. It does not make a global priority claim for every relative reconstruction formulation. The BV/BRST and Yang–Mills results are conditional interface theorems. No quantization, anomaly-cancellation, mass-gap, confinement, or Haag–Kastler realization claim is made.

Suggested citation

J. Scott Little, Admissible Witness Descent for Higher Gauge Fields, Website Edition v1.0, September 8, 2026.

© 2026 J. Scott Little. All rights reserved.

Definitions, results, and open questions in this paper

Graphical dependency view

Mathematical neighborhood

No source-verified mathematical edges are available yet, so no diagram is inferred.

Typed research graph

What this paper does in the archive

Generated from source-governed graph relations. Empty panels are left explicit rather than inferred from prose.

Open full research graph →

Defines

No source-verified relation recorded yet.

Proves

No source-verified relation recorded yet.

Conjectures

No source-verified relation recorded yet.

Uses

No source-verified relation recorded yet.

Opens

No source-verified relation recorded yet.

Closes

No source-verified relation recorded yet.

Claim Boundaries

No source-verified relation recorded yet.

Version manifest

Public versions

VersionDateStatusFileRevision note
1.0Independent research article — not peer reviewedPDF